Quantcast

No “spiritual or new age” books, please

I receive quite a few manuscripts with a spiritual or “New Age” slant, but I only publish religious books that avow Christian theology (cf. Matthew 26:75) — as a matter of principle, I avoid books that rely upon a holistic or nondenominational  view of spirituality. This is not to say that I have a literal-minded or anti-ecumenical view of Christianity; rather, my view is that “we are not skilled to understand” the ways in which the truth claims of science and Christianity are ultimately consistent. 

By contrast, I view generic or “New Age” spiritualism as neither science nor religion. In terms of science, I see spiritualism’s truth claims as having only accidental predictive power–I believe spiritualism is describing actual phenomena of consciousness, but that spiritualists, are, to be blunt, exercising their God-given powers of imagination and narrative to make an appealing story. In terms of religion, I view spiritualism as merely a denatured form of authentic faith, sadly alienated from its historical and cultural sources of authority and meaning.
Buzz Me  

Related posts:

  1. Sacred Hoops: Spiritual Lessons of a Hardwood Warrior by Phil Jackson, Hugh Delehanty
  2. Mr. T: True Christian, True Hero
  3. Forbes: Dan Brown a stealth celebrity?
  4. ‘Theory of mind’, MRI, and Christianity
  5. books for a “Formal Operational” view of religion

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>