Entries Tagged as ''

Jesus’s MySpace page

blog.myspace.com/90414021

I have noticed that a lot of people in this time are living their lives, as they feel that I would like them too.
They live their lives reading the Bible, and believing everything written in it… what these people have to understand is that I did not write the Bible… humans did.

Now humans have also written many forms of fiction… and a lot of those fictional stories are against what it states in the Bible.

So in saying this, should these stories also be taken into account to our daily lives?

Or are they simply stories to give us something to think about, or entertain us?

I will let you, the mortals, make your OWN decision.

Think for yourselves, be true to yourself, and remember, you only live once… make it count.

Signing out, Jesus.

anglo Islamic convert on MQJ

Small Change: On “Critial Reviews”

The whole point of books like “Misquoting Jesus” is that the so called “Word of God” is actually the word of men! If every Greek manuscript disappeared from the face of the earth, the word of men would still be preached tomorrow.

What’s bizarre is that the top of this page this same reader writes:

  • Middle name is Paul. Muslim convert

How does he distinguish between Christianity and Islam?

Technorati Tags: , ,

thoughtful response to Misquoting Jesus

blog.myspace.com/6195908

I wrote a letter to Dr. Craig Blomberg of the Denver Seminary in response to his review of Bart Ehrman’s “Misquoting Jesus” and the two letters follow:

Dear Mr. Blomberg:

I want to thank you for your sober and enlightening review of Dr. Ehrman’s new book Misquoting Jesus. I read that Ehrman stated that his publisher’s wanted the name of the book changed to as to sell more copies. I presume, as you inferred, to appear more conspiratorial. I think we can agree that the real evil here is a publisher that decides a deceptive title will sell more units.

I consider myself to be a secular humanist and I find that when books such as this are published, others of my ilk proclaimed it as an almost revolutionary text proving the Bible to be uninspired. I believe your analysis is very grounding and helpful in my attempt to weigh evidence accurately and as balanced as possible

ehrman,

A prayerful response to MQJ

Venite temporo iter facere - The Habit of Conversion

Then I learned that Ehrman himself became an agnostic after doing this research. This might be easy to do, but I decided that what we get from reading scripture is a matter of faith. If we read scripture for facts, we are missing the most important part — our relationship with God. If we read scripture in prayer, remain open to what God is telling us and balance that with what we know is real, we can be pretty confident that we will learn God’s Word for us.

Just as we are alive and our prayer is alive, the scripture or any spiritual reading also becomes alive. The deeper I delve into my Benedictine Spirituality, the more in tune I become with praying the scripture instead of just reading it. One of the vows of the Benedictines is “conversatio morum” or a calling to the habit of conversion. To me that means always challenging myself to learn, question and grow. It means spending time in prayer reading holy writings and scripture, pulling out what speaks to me, meditating on it, praying about it, chewing it over for awhile, maybe a day or a week and taking it in as part of me. Of course this doesn’t happen everytime I read, but there are times when a phrase will stop and make me look again.

This is called “lectio”. It is (w)holy reading in prayer. It spills over into all aspects of my life. I cogitate over a phrase, pray about it, talk about it, write about it and maybe even create art. Sometimes it’s not anything I have read but what I have heard or experienced that moves me to this kind of prayer. I wish I could say I do this everyday like it says in Benedict’s Rule. I can say that when I do, my relationship with God deepens to new levels of understanding.

misquoting jesus, , ,