<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Punctuation of Fictional Dialogue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2009/02/punctation-of-fictional-dialogue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2009/02/punctation-of-fictional-dialogue/</link>
	<description>An innovative, idiosyncratic independent publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:39:05 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: wfz-admin</title>
		<link>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2009/02/punctation-of-fictional-dialogue/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>wfz-admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/?p=172612#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Michael -- I agree --&quot;Shit shit shit&quot; could be what the author meant to convey, so it might be correct here.

In a lot of fiction manuscripts I read, the incorrectness of the punctuation is not even debatable. A lot of people seem to believe that dialogue shouldn&#039;t have any punctuation within it at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael &#8212; I agree &#8211;&#8221;Shit shit shit&#8221; could be what the author meant to convey, so it might be correct here.</p>
<p>In a lot of fiction manuscripts I read, the incorrectness of the punctuation is not even debatable. A lot of people seem to believe that dialogue shouldn&#8217;t have any punctuation within it at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hartford</title>
		<link>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2009/02/punctation-of-fictional-dialogue/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hartford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/?p=172612#comment-114</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d agree with you on the first, but I think there are some subtle differences in the second.  &quot;Shit shit shit&quot; seems hurried and muttered under one&#039;s breath, like keeping cadence while rushing after a missed train; &quot;Shit, Shit, Shit!&quot; is more emphatic, pounding one&#039;s fist on the bar after making an important point; and &quot;Shit ... shit ... shit ...&quot; is more contemplative, perhaps while reading an essay by Spinoza that suddenly makes everything clear.

How about non-quoted dialogue, implying a faultily-recalled, not-quite-verbatim line?  (Raymond Carver and Andre Dubus frequently did this.)  Or the non-quoted dialogue preceded by a dash, so it looks almost like lines from a play?  (I think of James Joyce&#039;s short stories, and a few contemporary Europeans, when I see this style.)  So long as it&#039;s consistent through the piece--mixing and matching dialogue formats would be a mess--I like the clues that dialogue style can offer about a story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d agree with you on the first, but I think there are some subtle differences in the second.  &#8220;Shit shit shit&#8221; seems hurried and muttered under one&#8217;s breath, like keeping cadence while rushing after a missed train; &#8220;Shit, Shit, Shit!&#8221; is more emphatic, pounding one&#8217;s fist on the bar after making an important point; and &#8220;Shit &#8230; shit &#8230; shit &#8230;&#8221; is more contemplative, perhaps while reading an essay by Spinoza that suddenly makes everything clear.</p>
<p>How about non-quoted dialogue, implying a faultily-recalled, not-quite-verbatim line?  (Raymond Carver and Andre Dubus frequently did this.)  Or the non-quoted dialogue preceded by a dash, so it looks almost like lines from a play?  (I think of James Joyce&#8217;s short stories, and a few contemporary Europeans, when I see this style.)  So long as it&#8217;s consistent through the piece&#8211;mixing and matching dialogue formats would be a mess&#8211;I like the clues that dialogue style can offer about a story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
