W. Frederick Zimmerman gave 5 stars to: David Falkayn

Rethinking Poul Anderson: better than Heinlein?, June 17, 2009

I have been re-reading the three volumes (so far) in Baen’s reissue of the Van Rijn, Falkayn, and Flandry stories, and the headline has been rediscovering just how good a science fiction writer Poul Anderson was. One of the back cover blurbs says something to the effect that “Poul Anderson … probably does more different things well than anyone else in the field”, and I think that is a very fair assessment. The science is great, the politics is very good, the characterization is very good, and the maturity level of the author is far higher than, say, Heinlein. Anderson’s very best is not as good as Heinlein’s very best, but almost everything of Anderson’s is far better than Heinlein’s weak stuff–and none of it is marred by the self-indulgence and wish fulfillment that marked later Heinlein.