Quantcast

#Google Editions has it in for science and academic publishers

Who has exorbitant prices, other than scientific, academic, and professional publishers?

Mr. Turvey said that Google would probably allow publishers to charge consumers the same price for digital editions as they do for new hardcover versions. He said Google would reserve the right to adjust prices that it deemed “exorbitant.”

via Poised to Sell E-Books, Google Takes On Amazon – NYTimes.com.

Sell #Google Editions from your own website

Publishers Marketplace scoops world!

One major aspect of Edition not yet reported is that it will allow online retailers to sell the digital books directly from their site, with Google playing the role of electronic distributor. The selling feature is linked to Preview, the program that already lets retailers present the ability to browse inside Partner books.

via Publishers Lunch Deluxe: Closer Reading of Google Edition.

Ceci n’est pas un ebook « Black Plastic Glasses

Is Google Editions the death of e-books?

I don’t think so … sitting upright at a PC will never be the best way to read a long complex document.

Google Editions is the coming out party for “cloud publishing” where content is purchased, but never physically owned. Cloud publishing is where downloading will only be done to enable offline access, not ownership. If this works, we won’t care about epub, we wont care about Digital Editions vs. Mobipocket vs. Kindle Reader. All we will need is a device with a browser that allows us to log on to our Google Account and install Google Gears.

via Ceci n’est pas un ebook « Black Plastic Glasses.

Book Kismet: you hold the fate of books in your hands

I’ve started working on a project called Book Kismet. The initial seed for the idea was this message I posted to a Google Group devoted to an innovative “social books” project housed at the University of Toronto, and it’s my hope that BK will wind up being a useful tool for them.

The functionality I want to see in version 1.0 is as follows:

user supplies author name, book title or ISBN

system provides list of ISBNs & titles from one of:

  • Amazon API
  • Google Book Search API
  • LibraryThing API
  • OpenBook API

user selects either author or book (by ISBN)

system provides (some of):

  • cover image via one of {Amazon, LT, GBS, Open}
  • link to Amazon detail page; link to Amazon reviews for boook
  • link to GBS title page; link to GBS reviews for book
  • link to LibraryThing detail page for this book (all ISBNs); link to LibraryThing book reviews
  • link to Google API answer set on “author lastname” “author firstname” “discussion forum” “booktitle”
  • embedded Google Trends widget with book title and author name as keywords
  • Google Groups (old Usenet) search results

etc.

Book Kismet: an open, platform-agnostic architecture for social books

I have been thinking about the challenge of integrating physical and digital worlds via [social books] and I have a suggestion.  I think you need to be designing at a higher level of abstraction: really, designing a standard instead of a device.

Think about it this way.

Class of bibliographic entities:
  • printed book (i think “codex” is too jargony)
  • journal article
  • report
  • e-book

Class of physical Enablers

  • CueCat
  • Kindle 1 & 2, Kindle DX, etc.
  • Sony E-Reader

Class of entity-level citation schemes, e.g.

  • APA
  • Chicago Manual
  • BibTex
  • EndNote
  • Digital Object Identifiers

Class of “pinpoint” citation services, e.g.

  • Legal standards (West, F.2d 1033)
  • Scientific standards: Nature 355:321 12 October
  • Paragraph and line numbering schemes

Class of web resources

  • Single purpose websites (1 per book)
  • Google Book repository
  • Amazon catalog
  • LibraryThing

Class of web services

  • Annotation
  • Discussion
  • Recommending

Right now, we have a variety of entities pursuing efforts to connect all these classes with single threads e.g. Amazon connects e-book documents with Kindle with the Amazon catalog with recommending. Kindle is a closed system so that thread is the only you one can follow if you own the Kindle class of Enabler.  the proposed sBook would connect codex books using a custom-built Enabler with some undetermined citation format with purpose built websites and offer Discussion and Recommending services.

What is really needed, IMHO, is an open, platform-agnostic architecture that allows mix and match of all these classes. I believe Kindle is eventually going to be a limited success (not a failure, just a 10% of the market type thing) because it locks the reader into a single thread of classes. I’m more optimistic about Google Book Search because I think their physical enabler will be any device that can read a PDF and I think they will eventually ave a good citation standard and robust discussion services at GBS.

will my Nimble book be published as an e-book? #ebook

Yes and no.

Yes: I  upload all books published by Nimble Books to Google Book Search,  Amazon Search Inside the Book, and Amazon Upgrade.  There is a lag of 1-4 months after nominal publication date before the book actually appears in those places.  As you may know, once the Google author settlement is closed, Google will begin offering PDF downloads of “their” books.

No: my stance on e-books is that I am waiting until I can deploy my entire list (which includes many color books with high production values) to a device that can read and display near-full-size (~ 8 x 10) color PDFs.  Tech-savvy readers will be aware that the Kindle DX claims to have a native PDF reader and a low-res (150 pixel per inch) grayscale display … but at this writing, Amazon has not yet answered the $64 million question: whether there will be a way for publishers to deploy their PDFs to Kindle via the Amazon DTP system or their Mobipocket subsidiary.

@cnet Google: We’re good for journalism | Murdoch: $NEWS is going extinct

As I remarked last month, the most frightening thing about the current state of newspapers is that even someone like Rupert Murdoch, who has made billions of dollars by accepting (and creating) brutal realities that others were to shy to to embrace, is now in denial.

Google is under attack for profiting from content produced by newspaper executives, magazine publishers, and The Associated Press, but the company’s Marissa Mayer on Wednesday sought to convince the U.S. Senate that Google adds to journalism, too.

via Google: We’re good for journalism | Digital Media – CNET News.

Integrating physical books and electronic services

From an email to a guy who’s got a project to integrate the world of physical “codex” books with electronic resources.

I have been thinking about the challenge of integrating physical and digital worlds via tools like the sBook and I have a suggestion.  I think you need to be designing at a higher level of abstraction: really, designing a standard instead of a device.

Think about it this way.

Class of bibliographic entities:
  • printed book (i think “codex” is too jargony)
  • journal article
  • report
  • e-book
Class of physical Enablers
  • CueCat
  • Kindle
  • Sony E-Reader
  • the sBook enabler
Class of citation services, e.g.
  •      Legal standards (West, F.2d 1033)
  •      Scientific standards: Nature 355:321 12 October
  •      Digital Object Identifiers
     
Class of web resources
  • Single purpose websites (1 per book)
  • Google Book repository
  • Amazon catalog
  • LibraryThing
Class of web services
  • Annotation
  • Discussion
  • Recommending
Right now, we have a variety of entities pursuing efforts to connect all these classes with single threads or paths,  e.g. Amazon connects e-book documents with Kindle with the Amazon catalog with recommending. Kindle is a closed system so that thread is the only you one can follow if you own the Kindle class of Enabler.  
Tthe proposed sBook would connect codex books using a custom-built Enabler with some undetermined citation format with purpose built websites and offer Discussion and Recommending services.
What is really needed, IMHO is an open architecture that allows mix and match of all these classes.  I believe Kindle is eventually going to be a limited success (not a failure, just a 10% of the market type thing) because it locks the reader into a single thread of classes. I’m more optimistic about Google Book Search because I think their physical enabler will be any device that can read a PDF and I think they will eventually ave a good citation standard and robust discussion services at GBS.
Clear as mud?
Hastily,

Delay Looming For #Google Books Settlement Deadline? > a short one! the asteroid still on its way …

Headline overstated.  What the story actually said is that a group of authors (most notably, the estate of John Steinbeck) filed a motion asking for a 4-month delay.  Google finessed them by agreeing to a 2-month delay. Big deal!  The asteroid is still on its way…

Meanwhile, in response, attorney for the publishers’sub-class, Michael Boni, said the authors’ complaint was without merit and asked the court to reject it. However, Boni, said that “independent of” the authors motion, “plaintiffs and Google are amenable to a 60-day extension.”  

via Delay Looming For Google Settlement Deadline? – 4/27/2009 11:49:00 AM – Publishers Weekly.

#Google CEO: There will be no #heroes in The Transparent Society

According to Maureen Dowd, Google’s CEO thinks that in the transparent society of the future

“It’s fair to say that there will be no heroes,” Schmidt says. “Heroism requires understanding the person in the absolute best light. I’m not sure this is good. What was Barack Obama like in elementary school? ‘Oh, yeah, here’s a picture of him picking his nose. God, he’s no longer a hero.’ ”

via Op-Ed Columnist – Dinosaur at the Gate – NYTimes.com

I totally disagree. Heroism is not  how about having others see us as flawless.  Heroism is about doing the right thing, even in the face of your own flaws.

Maureen Dowd (one of my heroes) missed the lead here.