Quantcast

John Sargent awarded the Nimble Books Baton of Glory

Macmillan CEO has been awarded the Nimble Books Baton of Glory in honor of his superb service to the publishing industry in the recent Amazon-Macmillan tiff.

Book Kismet: an open, platform-agnostic architecture for social books

I have been thinking about the challenge of integrating physical and digital worlds via [social books] and I have a suggestion.  I think you need to be designing at a higher level of abstraction: really, designing a standard instead of a device.

Think about it this way.

Class of bibliographic entities:
  • printed book (i think “codex” is too jargony)
  • journal article
  • report
  • e-book

Class of physical Enablers

  • CueCat
  • Kindle 1 & 2, Kindle DX, etc.
  • Sony E-Reader

Class of entity-level citation schemes, e.g.

  • APA
  • Chicago Manual
  • BibTex
  • EndNote
  • Digital Object Identifiers

Class of “pinpoint” citation services, e.g.

  • Legal standards (West, F.2d 1033)
  • Scientific standards: Nature 355:321 12 October
  • Paragraph and line numbering schemes

Class of web resources

  • Single purpose websites (1 per book)
  • Google Book repository
  • Amazon catalog
  • LibraryThing

Class of web services

  • Annotation
  • Discussion
  • Recommending

Right now, we have a variety of entities pursuing efforts to connect all these classes with single threads e.g. Amazon connects e-book documents with Kindle with the Amazon catalog with recommending. Kindle is a closed system so that thread is the only you one can follow if you own the Kindle class of Enabler.  the proposed sBook would connect codex books using a custom-built Enabler with some undetermined citation format with purpose built websites and offer Discussion and Recommending services.

What is really needed, IMHO, is an open, platform-agnostic architecture that allows mix and match of all these classes. I believe Kindle is eventually going to be a limited success (not a failure, just a 10% of the market type thing) because it locks the reader into a single thread of classes. I’m more optimistic about Google Book Search because I think their physical enabler will be any device that can read a PDF and I think they will eventually ave a good citation standard and robust discussion services at GBS.

Demise of Shaman Drum & Future of Bookselling and Publishing

The immiment demise of Ann Arbor’s quirky, well-regarded Shaman Drum bookstore has sparked a very interesting thread over at the Ann Arbor Chronicle, which inspired me to write this about the future of e-books and publishing.  The whole thread is worth reading.

 

(in response to post 28) Scott — I am well aware of Tablet PCs — I attended Microsoft’s alpha stage Tablet SDK meeting and had a first-generation Motion Tablet– but IMHO there is still a long way to go for Tablets to approach the readability and portability of paper. That is to say nothing of paper’s instant-on feature, complete absence of [electronic] bugs, and [sometimes literally] bulletproof security compared to Windows Vista Tablet PC Edition …

What I don’t like about the current generation of e-readers is that the e-book manufacturers are forcing major design and readability compromises on publishers–a classic example of technology-driven product development. What publishers want and need is to be able to display e-books using the universal publishing standard for high-quality design display: PDF. You simply can’t present a design-driven title likeTHE DEFINITIVE ILLUSTRATED HISTORY OF TORPEDO BOATS (for Anonymouse’s sake!) in device-independent dumbed-down HTML.

As you may know, the current generation of book readers uses the E-Ink technology, which currently does B&W 800 x 640 on a flexible substrate. They project that color E-Ink devices will become available no earlier than 2011. Hi-res is important: readability studies shows that paper with 600 dpi is the gold standard. a 600 dpi 8 x 10 page is 4800 x 6000 pixels, which is still a pretty big image even for today’s computers.

I suspect that E-Ink devices capable of displaying hi-res PDF will be ~ 2015.

What does this mean for publishers and booksellers? For publishers, it means a (losing) struggle with e-book manufacturers over their share of the revenue pie. For booksellers, it means less revenue from simply delivering physically encoded books to people, and figuring out a way to move up the value chain–which I think is what Karl Pohrt is planning to do. I like the idea of a bookstore as a salon, but if I look around at other industries it seems that continuous physical presence is a more difficult business model to operate than old reliables like personal appearances, training classes, and consulting services.

Authors Guild Afraid of Synthesizer Speech

I wish the Author’s Guild wouldn’t put themselves in the position of complaining about everything new.

When the Kindle has a Text-to-Speech service that sounds like James Earl Jones, then I’ll start worrying.

What the Author’s Guild could do that would actually be helpful to its members is to set up a registry where authors can sign up, indicate whether they prefer to read their own books and whether they want to be considered for reading other people’s works, and leave a voice sample in a format that can (eventually) be transferred to the Kindle.

This will put a political and possibly legal  burden on Amazon and audio publishers to look at the registry first.

The Authors Guild is warning its members that Kindle 2’s Text-to-Speech function is an unauthorized use of audio rights and may be “undermining” publishers’ audio markets. The organization today sent an alert to members and posted the alert on its website.

via Authors Guild and Amazon Disagree Over Kindle’s Text-to-Speech Software – 2/12/2009 12:30:00 PM – Publishers Weekly.