<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nimble Books LLC &#187; navy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/tag/navy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>An innovative, idiosyncratic independent publisher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:16:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Hyphens and Italics in #Naval Acronyms? No and no.</title>
		<link>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2009/07/hyphens-and-italics-in-naval-acronyms-no-and-no/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2009/07/hyphens-and-italics-in-naval-acronyms-no-and-no/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred Zimmerman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nimble Books Style Guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nimble Books Style Manual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punctuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torpedo Boats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/?p=174348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the process of editing the ten volume history of torpedo boats by Joe Hinds, I realized that I made life difficult for myself by introducing a variety of inconsistencies.  The solutions:</p>
<p>No hyphens in ship numbers: the US Navy&#8217;s official standard is no hyphen, e.g. CV 77, PT 109.  So, henceforth: MAS 451, S 12, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the process of editing the<a href="http://www.nimblebooks.com/aom/shop.php?c=TB&amp;x=Torpedo_Boats"> ten volume history of torpedo boats</a> by Joe Hinds, I realized that I made life difficult for myself by introducing a variety of inconsistencies.  The solutions:</p>
<p><strong>No hyphens in ship numbers:</strong> the US Navy&#8217;s official standard is no hyphen, e.g. CV 77, PT 109.  So, henceforth: MAS 451, S 12, TKA 123, PQ 17.</p>
<p><strong>No italics in ship numbers</strong>: PT 109, not <em>PT 109.</em> Italicizing ship numbers may be Chicago style, but it is a pain to select and highlight those little words, so henceforth, no italics.</p>
<div style="float:left;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"><a href="http://www.google.com/reader/link?url=http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2009/07/hyphens-and-italics-in-naval-acronyms-no-and-no/&title=Hyphens and Italics in #Naval Acronyms? No and no.&srcTitle=Nimble Books LLC&srcURL=http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress"target="_blank" rel=""><img border="0" src="http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-google-buzz/icon/5.png" style="opacity:1;filter:alpha(opacity=100)" onmouseover="this.style.opacity=0.8;this.filters.alpha.opacity=80" onmouseout="this.style.opacity=1;this.filters.alpha.opacity=100"/> </a></div>

<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2009/03/naval-another-positive-review-for-richard-worths-in-the-shadow-of-the-battleship-considering-the-cruisers-of-world-war-ii/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: #naval Another positive review for Richard Worth&#8217;s In the Shadow of the Battleship: Considering the Cruisers of World War II'>#naval Another positive review for Richard Worth&#8217;s In the Shadow of the Battleship: Considering the Cruisers of World War II</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2009/03/stylefail-numbers-followed-by-numbers-naval-specifications/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: #stylefail Numbers followed by numbers (naval specifications)'>#stylefail Numbers followed by numbers (naval specifications)</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2009/04/usagefail-hyphens-in-wwii-naval-convoy-names/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: #usagefail Hyphens in WWII #naval convoy names?'>#usagefail Hyphens in WWII #naval convoy names?</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2009/07/hyphens-and-italics-in-naval-acronyms-no-and-no/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>my US Navy budget for 2010-2014</title>
		<link>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/08/my-us-navy-budget-for-2010-2014/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/08/my-us-navy-budget-for-2010-2014/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wfz-admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CVN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/?p=171897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>2 x LHA = $8B
10 x DDG-51 = $20B</p>
<p>the remaining $7B into developing long-range variants of the X-47 UCASB.</p>
<p>Information Dissemination
Given Huntington&#8217;s advice, the Navy&#8217;s existing plan, the operational considerations, the Maritime Strategy, and $35 billion over 5 years&#8230; what would be your shipbuilding plan, and why? The FY09-1FY13 plan the Navy released in this budget [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 x LHA = $8B<br />
10 x DDG-51 = $20B</p>
<p>the remaining $7B into developing long-range variants of the X-47 UCASB.</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://informationdissemination.blogspot.com/">Information Dissemination</a><br />
Given Huntington&#8217;s advice, the Navy&#8217;s existing plan, the operational considerations, the Maritime Strategy, and $35 billion over 5 years&#8230; what would be your shipbuilding plan, and why? The FY09-1FY13 plan the Navy released in this budget year can be found here for comparison. Remember, we are talking about 5 years from FY10 &#8211; FY14 here, but it should be part of a larger strategy.</p></blockquote>
<div style="float:left;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"><a href="http://www.google.com/reader/link?url=http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/08/my-us-navy-budget-for-2010-2014/&title=my US Navy budget for 2010-2014&srcTitle=Nimble Books LLC&srcURL=http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress"target="_blank" rel=""><img border="0" src="http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-google-buzz/icon/5.png" style="opacity:1;filter:alpha(opacity=100)" onmouseover="this.style.opacity=0.8;this.filters.alpha.opacity=80" onmouseout="this.style.opacity=1;this.filters.alpha.opacity=100"/> </a></div>

<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2009/11/navy-84-ballistic-defense-ships/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: #navy &#8211; 84 ballistic defense ships!'>#navy &#8211; 84 ballistic defense ships!</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/08/navy-reverses-course-to-seek-third-stealth-destroyer-hamptonroadscom-pilotonlinecom/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Navy reverses course, to seek third stealth destroyer'>Navy reverses course, to seek third stealth destroyer</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2009/04/gates-defense-budget-back-to-1963-1975-1993/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: #Gates #defense budget: back to 1963? 1975? 1993?'>#Gates #defense budget: back to 1963? 1975? 1993?</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/08/my-us-navy-budget-for-2010-2014/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navy reverses course, to seek third stealth destroyer</title>
		<link>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/08/navy-reverses-course-to-seek-third-stealth-destroyer-hamptonroadscom-pilotonlinecom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/08/navy-reverses-course-to-seek-third-stealth-destroyer-hamptonroadscom-pilotonlinecom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wfz-admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDG 1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial base]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/?p=171866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, that was quick!</p>
<p>Looking at the future force scenarios, let&#8217;s say there are three of these guys in commission.  One in refit, one in the Atlantic/AFRICOM, one in the Pacific or Indian Ocean.</p>

<p>Navy reverses course, to seek third stealth destroyer &#124; HamptonRoads.com &#124; PilotOnline.com
PORTLAND, Maine (AP) _ The Navy has changed course and decided [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that was quick!</p>
<p>Looking at the future force scenarios, let&#8217;s say there are three of these guys in commission.  One in refit, one in the Atlantic/AFRICOM, one in the Pacific or Indian Ocean.</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://hamptonroads.com/2008/08/navy-reverses-course-seek-third-stealth-destroyer">Navy reverses course, to seek third stealth destroyer | HamptonRoads.com | PilotOnline.com</a><br />
PORTLAND, Maine (AP) _ The Navy has changed course and decided to push for construction of a third DDG-1000 destroyer that would be built at Bath Iron Works, Sen. Susan Collins said Monday.</p></blockquote>
<div style="float:left;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"><a href="http://www.google.com/reader/link?url=http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/08/navy-reverses-course-to-seek-third-stealth-destroyer-hamptonroadscom-pilotonlinecom/&title=Navy reverses course, to seek third stealth destroyer&srcTitle=Nimble Books LLC&srcURL=http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress"target="_blank" rel=""><img border="0" src="http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-google-buzz/icon/5.png" style="opacity:1;filter:alpha(opacity=100)" onmouseover="this.style.opacity=0.8;this.filters.alpha.opacity=80" onmouseout="this.style.opacity=1;this.filters.alpha.opacity=100"/> </a></div>

<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/rip-ddg-1000/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: RIP DDG 1000'>RIP DDG 1000</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2009/07/anaval-an-illustrated-history-of-u-s-navy-torpedo-boat-construction-in-world-war-ii/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: #Naval An Illustrated History of U.S. Navy Torpedo Boat Construction in World War II'>#Naval An Illustrated History of U.S. Navy Torpedo Boat Construction in World War II</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/06/w-frederick-zimmerman-gave-5-stars-to-ddg-81-winston-s-churchill-u-s-navy-destroyer/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: W. Frederick Zimmerman gave 5 stars to: DDG-81 WINSTON S. CHURCHILL, U.S. Navy Destroyer'>W. Frederick Zimmerman gave 5 stars to: DDG-81 WINSTON S. CHURCHILL, U.S. Navy Destroyer</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/08/navy-reverses-course-to-seek-third-stealth-destroyer-hamptonroadscom-pilotonlinecom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s the new classified threat the DDG-1000 can&#8217;t beat?</title>
		<link>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/08/whats-the-new-classified-threat-the-ddg-1000-cant-beat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/08/whats-the-new-classified-threat-the-ddg-1000-cant-beat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wfz-admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arleigh Burke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDG 1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/?p=171744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the new classified threat that the DDG-1000 can&#8217;t beat?</p>
<p>Navy: No Need to Add DDG 1000s After All &#8211; Defense News
Top Navy acquisition officials dramatically reversed course during a congressional hearing July 31, saying the service needed to purchase more Arleigh Burke-class DDG 51 destroyers, and no longer needs the next-generation destroyer it has been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the new classified threat that the DDG-1000 can&#8217;t beat?</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=3654864&#038;c=AME&#038;s=TOP">Navy: No Need to Add DDG 1000s After All &#8211; Defense News</a><br />
Top Navy acquisition officials dramatically reversed course during a congressional hearing July 31, saying the service needed to purchase more Arleigh Burke-class DDG 51 destroyers, and no longer needs the next-generation destroyer it has been pushing for over the past 13 years.</p>
<p>This, after years of vigorously claiming the service needed to move beyond the 1980s technology in the Burkes and leap ahead with the new ship, the DDG 1000 Zumwalt class. Now, they&#8217;re saying the Zumwalts just won&#8217;t cut it, citing the planned ship&#8217;s inability to fire advanced versions of the Standard Missile, contradicting previous industry claims.</p>
<p><strong>They also said there was a new &#8220;classified threat&#8221; for which the Burkes are better suited but would not go into specifics.</strong></p></blockquote>
<div style="float:left;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"><a href="http://www.google.com/reader/link?url=http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/08/whats-the-new-classified-threat-the-ddg-1000-cant-beat/&title=What's the new classified threat the DDG-1000 can't beat?&srcTitle=Nimble Books LLC&srcURL=http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress"target="_blank" rel=""><img border="0" src="http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-google-buzz/icon/5.png" style="opacity:1;filter:alpha(opacity=100)" onmouseover="this.style.opacity=0.8;this.filters.alpha.opacity=80" onmouseout="this.style.opacity=1;this.filters.alpha.opacity=100"/> </a></div>

<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/10/pictorial-book-about-ddg-1000-zumwalt-now-available/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Pictorial Book about DDG-1000 ZUMWALT now available'>Pictorial Book about DDG-1000 ZUMWALT now available</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2006/03/blackstar-spaceplane-system-retired/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Blackstar spaceplane system retired'>Blackstar spaceplane system retired</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/09/david-axebehind-the-navys-stealth-destroyer-shuffle/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: David Axe&gt;Behind the Navy&#8217;s Stealth Destroyer Shuffle'>David Axe&gt;Behind the Navy&#8217;s Stealth Destroyer Shuffle</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/08/whats-the-new-classified-threat-the-ddg-1000-cant-beat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>do whales do flips when they hear sonar?</title>
		<link>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/08/do-whales-do-flips-when-they-hear-sonar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/08/do-whales-do-flips-when-they-hear-sonar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wfz-admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/?p=171742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>this is a great idea, to get some actual data.  negative results won&#8217;t convince the whale-lovers that everything&#8217;s hunky-dory, though.</p>
<p>Somewhat beside the point, though, because, given the current composition of the Supreme Court, the ultimate outcome of this controversy is going to be a federal appeals or supreme court decision that says in no [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is a great idea, to get some actual data.  negative results won&#8217;t convince the whale-lovers that everything&#8217;s hunky-dory, though.</p>
<p>Somewhat beside the point, though, because, given the current composition of the Supreme Court, the ultimate outcome of this controversy is going to be a federal appeals or supreme court decision that says in no uncertain terms that the federal government&#8217;s interest in national security trumps the whales&#8217; rights.</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://hamptonroads.com/2008/08/researchers-tag-whales-track-ships-sonar-study">Researchers tag whales, track ships in sonar study | HamptonRoads.com | PilotOnline.com</a><br />
Debate has long raged over how the military&#8217;s use of sonar to detect enemy submarines affects dolphins and whales, which use sound to navigate, communicate and locate food.</p>
<p>Now, researchers are moving closer to getting some solid answers.</p>
<p>In a scientific first, experts tagged dozens of whales with sensors to track their movement and behavior while Navy ships operated nearby.</p></blockquote>
<div style="float:left;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"><a href="http://www.google.com/reader/link?url=http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/08/do-whales-do-flips-when-they-hear-sonar/&title=do whales do flips when they hear sonar?&srcTitle=Nimble Books LLC&srcURL=http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress"target="_blank" rel=""><img border="0" src="http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-google-buzz/icon/5.png" style="opacity:1;filter:alpha(opacity=100)" onmouseover="this.style.opacity=0.8;this.filters.alpha.opacity=80" onmouseout="this.style.opacity=1;this.filters.alpha.opacity=100"/> </a></div>

<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2005/10/here-come-the-blue-helicopters-joe-kleins-global-deception/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Here Come the Blue Helicopters &#8212; Joe Klein&#8217;s GLOBAL DECEPTION'>Here Come the Blue Helicopters &#8212; Joe Klein&#8217;s GLOBAL DECEPTION</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2006/04/whale-watchers-buy-a-vowel/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Whale Watchers: Buy a Vowel'>Whale Watchers: Buy a Vowel</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2006/12/worlds-tallest-man-saves-plastic-eating-dolphins/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: World&#8217;s tallest man saves plastic eating dolphins'>World&#8217;s tallest man saves plastic eating dolphins</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/08/do-whales-do-flips-when-they-hear-sonar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cause of the fire aboard CVN-73 George Washington</title>
		<link>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/cause-of-the-fire-aboar-cvn-73-george-washington/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/cause-of-the-fire-aboar-cvn-73-george-washington/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wfz-admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CVN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CVN-73 George Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipboard fires]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/cause-of-the-fire-aboar-cvn-73-george-washington/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The CO and Exec of George Washington got the chop for this.</p>
<p>God, fires aboard ship are terrifying.
Two top Navy officers fired over $70 million carrier blaze &#124; HamptonRoads.com &#124; PilotOnline.com</p>
<p>&#8230;the Navy said it concluded that the fire likely was caused by &#8220;unauthorized smoking that ignited flammable liquids and other combustible material improperly stored in an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CO and Exec of George Washington got the chop for this.</p>
<p>God, fires aboard ship are terrifying.<br />
<blockquote><a href="http://hamptonroads.com/2008/07/navy-relieves-top-officers-carrier-washington-after-fire">Two top Navy officers fired over $70 million carrier blaze | HamptonRoads.com | PilotOnline.com</a></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;the Navy said it concluded that the fire likely was caused by &#8220;unauthorized smoking that ignited flammable liquids and other combustible material improperly stored in an adjacent space.&#8221;</p>
<p>The fire and its intensity &#8220;were the result of a series of human acts that could have been prevented,&#8221; the Navy summary added. It cited &#8220;the storage of 90 gallons of refrigerant compressor oil in an unauthorized space&#8221; as a factor in the fire&#8217;s severity.</p>
<p>The summary said the fire began in a boiler exhaust and supply area and spread quickly because of a &#8220;chimney effect&#8221; in nearby spaces and duct work. The 12-hour battle to extinguish the fire injured 37 sailors, one of whom received first- and second-degree burns.</p></blockquote>
<p>[asa]1934840246[/asa]</p>
<div style="float:left;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"><a href="http://www.google.com/reader/link?url=http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/cause-of-the-fire-aboar-cvn-73-george-washington/&title=Cause of the fire aboard CVN-73 George Washington&srcTitle=Nimble Books LLC&srcURL=http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress"target="_blank" rel=""><img border="0" src="http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-google-buzz/icon/5.png" style="opacity:1;filter:alpha(opacity=100)" onmouseover="this.style.opacity=0.8;this.filters.alpha.opacity=80" onmouseout="this.style.opacity=1;this.filters.alpha.opacity=100"/> </a></div>

<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2007/06/boing-boings-fireproof-hobbit-home-in-the-woods/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Boing-boing&#8217;s Fireproof Hobbit Home in the Woods'>Boing-boing&#8217;s Fireproof Hobbit Home in the Woods</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2007/07/a-fire-next-door/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: A Fire Next Door'>A Fire Next Door</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/05/cvn-73-george-washington-us-navy-aircraft-carrier-by-w-frederick-zimmerman/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: CVN-73 GEORGE WASHINGTON, U.S. Navy Aircraft Carrier by W. Frederick Zimmerman'>CVN-73 GEORGE WASHINGTON, U.S. Navy Aircraft Carrier by W. Frederick Zimmerman</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/cause-of-the-fire-aboar-cvn-73-george-washington/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forward the Fourth Fleet</title>
		<link>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/forward-the-fourth-fleet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/forward-the-fourth-fleet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wfz-admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th Fleet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFRICOM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Axe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nimble Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/forward-the-fourth-fleet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a sign of the continued relative power of the U.S. that countries in Latin America and Africa are getting upset about primarily bureaucratic actions like the activation of 4th Fleet and AFRICOM.</p>
<p>Nimble Books author David Axe will be joining the 4th Fleet next week.</p>
<p>War Is Boring
Two weeks ago the U.S. Navy reactivated the long-defunct [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a sign of the continued relative power of the U.S. that countries in Latin America and Africa are getting upset about primarily bureaucratic actions like the activation of 4th Fleet and AFRICOM.</p>
<p>Nimble Books author David Axe will be joining the 4th Fleet next week.</p>
<p><a href="http://warisboring.com/?p=1268">War Is Boring</a><br />
<blockquote>Two weeks ago the <a href="http://www.as-coa.org/article.php?id=1134">U.S. Navy reactivated the long-defunct 4th Fleet</a> to oversea American warships in South American waters&#8230;</p>
<p>And this week, in a letter to Fidel Castro, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&#038;sid=adsUTg8jRQxQ&amp;refer=latin_america">Chavez accused the U.S. of rekindling the Cold War</a> through its actions down south. “They’re trying … to press the fear buttons,” he said.</p>
<p>But how scary is this? Next week I’ll join the USS Kearsarge amphibious ship for a mission to Nicaragua handing out free medical care.</p></blockquote>
<div style="float:left;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"><a href="http://www.google.com/reader/link?url=http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/forward-the-fourth-fleet/&title=Forward the Fourth Fleet&srcTitle=Nimble Books LLC&srcURL=http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress"target="_blank" rel=""><img border="0" src="http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-google-buzz/icon/5.png" style="opacity:1;filter:alpha(opacity=100)" onmouseover="this.style.opacity=0.8;this.filters.alpha.opacity=80" onmouseout="this.style.opacity=1;this.filters.alpha.opacity=100"/> </a></div>

<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/02/about-cool-maps-of-cuba-2/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: About COOL MAPS OF CUBA'>About COOL MAPS OF CUBA</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2009/02/napoleons-wars-an-international-history-1803-1815-charles-esdaile-books/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Napoleon&#8217;s Wars: An International History, 1803-1815 by Charles Esdaile'>Napoleon&#8217;s Wars: An International History, 1803-1815 by Charles Esdaile</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2007/05/all-the-drowned-sailors-by-raymond-b-lech/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: All the drowned sailors by Raymond B Lech'>All the drowned sailors by Raymond B Lech</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/forward-the-fourth-fleet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>a fundamental purpose of destroyers</title>
		<link>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/a-fundamental-purpose-of-destroyers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/a-fundamental-purpose-of-destroyers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wfz-admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carrier warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CVN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDG 1000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/24/a-fundamental-purpose-of-destroyers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>in carrier warfare is to man the perimeter of the carrier battle group and absorb heavy losses.  While it may not be true that you can never have enough surface combatants, 84 is only 7.5 escorts per 11 carrier groups.  An aditional 25 combatants, or ten escorts per carrier, would be a good [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in carrier warfare is to man the perimeter of the carrier battle group and <strong>absorb heavy losses</strong>.  While it may not be true that you can never have enough surface combatants, 84 is only 7.5 escorts per 11 carrier groups.  An aditional 25 combatants, or ten escorts per carrier, would be a good thing. Maybe at 12 or 15 escorts per carrier they start getting in each other&#8217;s way.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&amp;plckScript=blogScript&amp;plckElementId=blogDest&amp;plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&amp;plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3a9ce8d652-8231-410d-b878-05bf3a776dbf">Ares Homepage</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Collins and Senate colleagues had added $2.6 billion to the 2008 defense bill for the third DDG-1000, which was to have been built by her constituents at Bath Iron Works.<strong> She is now advocating for the construction of nine more DDG-51s at BIW, in order to maintain the shipyard&#8217;s employment level and turnover. This is apparently more important than any military need for the DDG-51s, which is not discussed in Collins&#8217; release.</strong></p>
<p>It is now time to revisit future Navy fleet requirements:  here&#8217;s a link to some recommended reading from <a href="http://www.csbaonline.org/4Publications/PubLibrary/B.20070307._Know_When_to_Hold/B.20070307._Know_When_to_Hold.pdf">Bob Work</a> at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, who has suggested ways of defining a new surface combatant</p></blockquote>
<div style="float:left;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"><a href="http://www.google.com/reader/link?url=http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/a-fundamental-purpose-of-destroyers/&title=a fundamental purpose of destroyers&srcTitle=Nimble Books LLC&srcURL=http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress"target="_blank" rel=""><img border="0" src="http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-google-buzz/icon/5.png" style="opacity:1;filter:alpha(opacity=100)" onmouseover="this.style.opacity=0.8;this.filters.alpha.opacity=80" onmouseout="this.style.opacity=1;this.filters.alpha.opacity=100"/> </a></div>

<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/why-arent-gpo-documents-in-full-view-in-google-book-search/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Why aren&#8217;t GPO documents in full view in Google Book Search?'>Why aren&#8217;t GPO documents in full view in Google Book Search?</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/obama-is-antidumb/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Obama is antidumb'>Obama is antidumb</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/obama-is-antidumb-2/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Obama is antidumb'>Obama is antidumb</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/a-fundamental-purpose-of-destroyers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System  for CVN-78 Gerald Ford</title>
		<link>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/electromagnetic-aircraft-launch-system-for-cvn-78-gerald-ford/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/electromagnetic-aircraft-launch-system-for-cvn-78-gerald-ford/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wfz-admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CVN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerald Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Naval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naval aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/?p=171587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A brand new launch technology for CVN-78 Gerald Ford.</p>
<p>Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System &#8211; Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) is a system under development by the United States Navy to launch aircraft from carriers using a linear motor drive instead of steam pistons, used in conventional aircraft catapults. This technology has the advantage [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A brand new launch technology for<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1934840025"> CVN-78 Gerald Ford.</a></p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_Aircraft_Launch_System">Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System &#8211; Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</a><br />
Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) is a system under development by the United States Navy to launch aircraft from carriers using a linear motor drive instead of steam pistons, used in conventional aircraft catapults. T<strong>his technology has the advantage of gradually increasing the aircraft&#8217;s speed, thus reducing the stress the plane&#8217;s airframe has to support. T</strong>he EMALS is currently being developed for the U.S. Navy&#8217;s newest Ford class aircraft carriers. It was also being considered for the Royal Navy&#8217;s new Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers (CVF), however the Royal Navy opted for a Vertical/Short Takeoff and Landing (VSTOL) configuration.</p></blockquote>
<div style="float:left;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"><a href="http://www.google.com/reader/link?url=http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/electromagnetic-aircraft-launch-system-for-cvn-78-gerald-ford/&title=Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System  for CVN-78 Gerald Ford&srcTitle=Nimble Books LLC&srcURL=http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress"target="_blank" rel=""><img border="0" src="http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-google-buzz/icon/5.png" style="opacity:1;filter:alpha(opacity=100)" onmouseover="this.style.opacity=0.8;this.filters.alpha.opacity=80" onmouseout="this.style.opacity=1;this.filters.alpha.opacity=100"/> </a></div>

<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/06/w-frederick-zimmerman-gave-5-stars-to-cvn-78-gerald-r-ford-u-s-navy-aircraft-carrier/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: W. Frederick Zimmerman gave 5 stars to: CVN-78 GERALD R. FORD, U.S. Navy Aircraft Carrier'>W. Frederick Zimmerman gave 5 stars to: CVN-78 GERALD R. FORD, U.S. Navy Aircraft Carrier</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2006/04/interview-with-chalmers-johnson/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Interview with Chalmers Johnson'>Interview with Chalmers Johnson</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/08/uss-america-the-newest-us-navy-aircraft-carrier/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: U.S.S. America, the newest U.S. Navy aircraft carrier (LHA-6)'>U.S.S. America, the newest U.S. Navy aircraft carrier (LHA-6)</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/electromagnetic-aircraft-launch-system-for-cvn-78-gerald-ford/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small surface combatants = airplanes</title>
		<link>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/small-surface-combatants-airplanes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/small-surface-combatants-airplanes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wfz-admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corvettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CVN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strait of Hormuz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/14/small-surface-combatants-airplanes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>ARMED FORCES JOURNAL &#8211; Think small &#8211; July 2008</p>
<p>The U.S. Navy already has a fleet of thousands of small surface combatants that can carry surface to surface missiles or antisubmarine weapons.  These small surface combatants are fast, flexible, and all-weather-capable.  They are called aircraft.</p>
<p>The Navy needs a credible force of multipurpose corvettes plus [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.armedforcesjournal.com/2008/07/3548183">ARMED FORCES JOURNAL &#8211; Think small &#8211; July 2008</a></p>
<p>The U.S. Navy already has a fleet of thousands of small surface combatants that can carry surface to surface missiles or antisubmarine weapons.  These small surface combatants are fast, flexible, and all-weather-capable.  They are called <b>aircraft.</b></p>
<blockquote><p>The Navy needs a credible force of multipurpose corvettes plus a modest number of missile combat craft to effectively bridge the existing gap in its surface warfare capabilities in the littoral waters. As many as 32 multipurpose corvettes organized in eight squadrons of four ships each should be acquired. They should be forward-deployed in similar manner as are surface MCM ships. In addition, a force of perhaps 12 missile combat craft could be deployed within a striking distance of selected choke points. The most critical deployment areas are the Persian Gulf/Strait of Hormuz, Horn of Africa/Bab-el Mandeb Strait, the Strait of Malacca and the Caribbean.</p></blockquote>
<div style="float:left;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"><a href="http://www.google.com/reader/link?url=http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/small-surface-combatants-airplanes/&title=Small surface combatants = airplanes&srcTitle=Nimble Books LLC&srcURL=http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress"target="_blank" rel=""><img border="0" src="http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/wp-google-buzz/icon/5.png" style="opacity:1;filter:alpha(opacity=100)" onmouseover="this.style.opacity=0.8;this.filters.alpha.opacity=80" onmouseout="this.style.opacity=1;this.filters.alpha.opacity=100"/> </a></div>

<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/a-fundamental-purpose-of-destroyers/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: a fundamental purpose of destroyers'>a fundamental purpose of destroyers</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2007/06/too-many-74s/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Too many &#8220;74s&#8221;'>Too many &#8220;74s&#8221;</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2005/10/proliferated-debkafile-moscow-arms-assad-with-a-top-flight-surface-missile/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: [Proliferated] DEBKAfile &#8211; Moscow Arms Assad with a Top-Flight Surface Missile'>[Proliferated] DEBKAfile &#8211; Moscow Arms Assad with a Top-Flight Surface Missile</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nimblebooks.com/wordpress/2008/07/small-surface-combatants-airplanes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
